<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battleship Potemkin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tatvam.com/blog/2009/03/31/battleship-potemkin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2009/03/31/battleship-potemkin/</link>
	<description>Tatvam Productions tells stories that reach for the truth, share the reality and communicate the inner meaning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vishwanath</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2009/03/31/battleship-potemkin/comment-page-1/#comment-23890</link>
		<dc:creator>vishwanath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=229#comment-23890</guid>
		<description>Hi, Nice blog..&lt;br&gt;I felt Battleship is a very overrated movie. I am not a film student (maybe that&#039;s the reason I failed to see what most people seem to), but I watched it for one reason: It was Charlie Chaplin&#039;s favorite movie. It may have been a good movie then but seeing such a movie now it fails to impress me. I know it wouldn&#039;t be fair to compare but Metropolis, which released just a couple of years after Battleship, is way ahead in all aspects from direction and camerawork to the concept of something so brilliant almost a 100 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Nice blog..<br />I felt Battleship is a very overrated movie. I am not a film student (maybe that&#39;s the reason I failed to see what most people seem to), but I watched it for one reason: It was Charlie Chaplin&#39;s favorite movie. It may have been a good movie then but seeing such a movie now it fails to impress me. I know it wouldn&#39;t be fair to compare but Metropolis, which released just a couple of years after Battleship, is way ahead in all aspects from direction and camerawork to the concept of something so brilliant almost a 100 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vishwanath</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2009/03/31/battleship-potemkin/comment-page-1/#comment-23623</link>
		<dc:creator>vishwanath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=229#comment-23623</guid>
		<description>Hi, Nice blog..&lt;br&gt;I felt Battleship is a very overrated movie. I am not a film student (maybe that&#039;s the reason I failed to see what most people seem to), but I watched it for one reason: It was Charlie Chaplin&#039;s favorite movie. It may have been a good movie then but seeing such a movie now it fails to impress me. I know it wouldn&#039;t be fair to compare but Metropolis, which released just a couple of years after Battleship, is way ahead in all aspects from direction and camerawork to the concept of something so brilliant almost a 100 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Nice blog..<br />I felt Battleship is a very overrated movie. I am not a film student (maybe that&#39;s the reason I failed to see what most people seem to), but I watched it for one reason: It was Charlie Chaplin&#39;s favorite movie. It may have been a good movie then but seeing such a movie now it fails to impress me. I know it wouldn&#39;t be fair to compare but Metropolis, which released just a couple of years after Battleship, is way ahead in all aspects from direction and camerawork to the concept of something so brilliant almost a 100 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
