<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Art of the Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/</link>
	<description>Tatvam Productions tells stories that reach for the truth, share the reality and communicate the inner meaning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Art of the Story : Almost As Good As Chocolate</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/comment-page-1/#comment-10942</link>
		<dc:creator>The Art of the Story : Almost As Good As Chocolate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=103#comment-10942</guid>
		<description>[...] The Art of the Story  14 Feb 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Art of the Story  14 Feb 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Art of the Story &#124; DesiPundit</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9983</link>
		<dc:creator>The Art of the Story &#124; DesiPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=103#comment-9983</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] This NY Times article on MIT&#8217;s Media Lab examining titled &#8220;Saving the Story (the Film Version)&#8221; bothered me on a number of dimensions. The first huge issue is confusing form and function or the story and how it is delivered. Consider&#8230;Continue reading this post [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tatvam.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] This NY Times article on MIT&#8217;s Media Lab examining titled &#8220;Saving the Story (the Film Version)&#8221; bothered me on a number of dimensions. The first huge issue is confusing form and function or the story and how it is delivered. Consider&hellip;Continue reading this post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temple oak</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9211</link>
		<dc:creator>temple oak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=103#comment-9211</guid>
		<description>i dont think it would be a problem when the technology develops a little bit more. definitely a problem will be there if you are talking about collective viewing.(if different viewers take different options of proceeding with the story). but again the question is that how long such a cinema hall experience is going to survive. my guess is that the film viewing is going to become more and more private exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think it would be a problem when the technology develops a little bit more. definitely a problem will be there if you are talking about collective viewing.(if different viewers take different options of proceeding with the story). but again the question is that how long such a cinema hall experience is going to survive. my guess is that the film viewing is going to become more and more private exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shripriya</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9182</link>
		<dc:creator>Shripriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=103#comment-9182</guid>
		<description>@temple oak - I agree that storytelling will get to be more of a participatory medium. That&#039;s already becoming the case for online MMORPGS. But how do you see that translating into writing or film where the product has to be created and handed off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@temple oak &#8211; I agree that storytelling will get to be more of a participatory medium. That&#8217;s already becoming the case for online MMORPGS. But how do you see that translating into writing or film where the product has to be created and handed off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temple oak</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator>temple oak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=103#comment-9170</guid>
		<description>Story telling will exist as long as human beings exist. But definitely there are going to be changes in the format. Story telling is going to become more interactive. A primitive version of that can be seen in the different gaming consoles. Story writing is going to remain creative but it will become more complex in that every outcome that spirals out from a single event will be painstackingly created by the writer in the future stories. Reader is going to be a more active part of the writing process that he choses a particular outcome out of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Story telling will exist as long as human beings exist. But definitely there are going to be changes in the format. Story telling is going to become more interactive. A primitive version of that can be seen in the different gaming consoles. Story writing is going to remain creative but it will become more complex in that every outcome that spirals out from a single event will be painstackingly created by the writer in the future stories. Reader is going to be a more active part of the writing process that he choses a particular outcome out of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Art of the Story : Almost As Good As Chocolate</title>
		<link>http://tatvam.com/blog/2008/12/05/the-art-of-the-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9127</link>
		<dc:creator>The Art of the Story : Almost As Good As Chocolate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tatvam.com/blog/?p=103#comment-9127</guid>
		<description>[...] The Art of the Story  5 Dec 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Art of the Story  5 Dec 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
